BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts landscaping construction Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts multi family housing Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts townhome construction Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts industrial building Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts tract home Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts retail construction Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts institutional building Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts parking structure Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts condominium Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts custom home Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts Subterranean parking Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts Medical building Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts low-income housing Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts production housing Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts structural steel construction Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts high-rise construction Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts office building Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts mid-rise construction Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts condominiums Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts casino resort Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts concrete tilt-up Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts
    Cambridge Massachusetts construction scheduling expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts multi family design expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts construction claims expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts roofing and waterproofing expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts building code expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts construction code expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts construction safety expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Consultant Builders Information
    Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Massachusetts Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Building Consultant Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Cambridge Massachusetts

    No state license required for general contracting. Licensure required for plumbing and electrical trades. Companies selling home repair services must be registered with the state.


    Building Consultant Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Central Massachusetts Inc
    Local # 2280
    51 Pullman Street
    Worcester, MA 01606

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Massachusetts Home Builders Association
    Local # 2200
    700 Congress St Suite 200
    Quincy, MA 02169

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Greater Boston
    Local # 2220
    700 Congress St. Suite 202
    Quincy, MA 02169

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Consultant 10/ 10

    North East Builders Assn of MA
    Local # 2255
    170 Main St Suite 205
    Tewksbury, MA 01876

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders and Remodelers Association of Western Mass
    Local # 2270
    240 Cadwell Dr
    Springfield, MA 01104

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Bristol-Norfolk Home Builders Association
    Local # 2211
    65 Neponset Ave Ste 3
    Foxboro, MA 02035

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders & Remodelers Association of Cape Cod
    Local # 2230
    9 New Venture Dr #7
    South Dennis, MA 02660

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Consultant 10/ 10


    Building Consultant News and Information
    For Cambridge Massachusetts


    Macron Visits Notre Dame 2 Years After Devastating Fire

    New York Appellate Court Affirms 1966 Insurance Policy Continues to Cover WTC Asbestos Claims

    Recent Federal Court Decision Favors Class Action Defendants

    Construction Costs Must Be Reasonable

    Minnesota Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C" Grade for the Second Time

    Homebuilders Offer Hope for U.K. Economy

    Colorado Mayors Should Not Sacrifice Homeowners to Lure Condo Developers

    Axa Unveils Plans to Transform ‘Stump’ Into London Skyscraper

    Other Colorado Cities Looking to Mirror Lakewood’s Construction Defect Ordinance

    Recording “Un-Neighborly” Documents

    Business Risk Exclusions (j) 5 and (j) 6 Found Ambiguous

    Condos Down in Denver Due to Construction Defect Litigation

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in 2022 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Colorado Defective Construction is Not Considered "Property Damage"

    Construction Firms Complain of Missed Payments on Redevelopment Project

    Home-Rentals Wall Street Made Say Grow or Go: Real Estate

    Gilbane Project Exec Completes His Mission Against the Odds

    Construction Defect Claim Must Be Defended Under Florida Law

    Estimate Tops $5.5B for Cost of Rebuilding After Maui Fires

    Additional Elements a Plaintiff Must Plead and Prove to Enforce Restrictive Covenant

    Deck Collapse Raises Questions about Building Defects

    New York Federal Court Enforces Construction Exclusion, Rejects Reimbursement Claim

    Fire Damages Unfinished Hospital Tower at NYU Langone Medical Center

    Federal Judge Dismisses Insurance Coverage Lawsuit In Construction Defect Case

    Las Vegas, Back From the Bust, Revives Dead Projects

    ASCE Statement on Devastating Tornado Damages Throughout U.S.

    Filing Motion to Increase Lien Transfer Bond (Before Trial Court Loses Jurisdiction Over Final Judgment)

    How SmartThings Wants to Automate Your Home

    Lawmakers Strike Deal on New $38B WRDA

    Ninth Circuit Holds Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Applies Beyond All-Risk Policies

    What to Do Before OSHA Comes Knocking

    Engineer Probing Champlain Towers Debacle Eyes Possibility of Three Successive Collapses

    Smart Cities Offer New Ideas for Connectivity

    Texas Court Construes Breach of Contract Exclusion Narrowly in Duty-to-Defend Case

    Are You Ready For 2015?

    Options When there is a Construction Lien on Your Property

    Arbitrator May Use Own Discretion in Consolidating Construction Defect Cases

    Insurers' Motion to Knock Out Bad Faith, Negligent Misrepresentation Claims in Construction Defect Case Denied

    You’re Only as Good as Those with Whom You Contract

    Preparing Your Business For Internal Transition

    Yet ANOTHER Reminder to Always Respond

    Georgia Supreme Court Says Construction Defects Can Be an “Occurrence”

    He Turned Wall Street Offices Into Homes. Now He Vows to Remake New York

    Appraisal Appropriate Despite Pending Coverage Issues

    Workers on Big California Bridge Tackle Oil Wells, Seismic Issues

    Wow! A Mechanic’s Lien Bill That Helps Subcontractors and Suppliers

    North Carolina Court Rules In Favor Of All Sums

    Additional Dismissals of COVID Business Interruption, Civil Authority Claims

    Lewis Brisbois Ranked Tier 1 Nationally for Insurance Law, Mass Tort/Class Actions Defense by U.S. News/Best Lawyers

    Deterioration Known To Insured Forecloses Collapse Coverage
    Corporate Profile

    CAMBRIDGE MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING CONSULTANT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Cambridge, Massachusetts Building Consultant Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Consultant News & Info
    Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Courts Will Not Second-Guess Public Entities When it Comes to Design Immunity

    May 13, 2024 —
    It was a bizarre confluence of events. Jorgen Stufkosky was driving on SR-154 in Santa Ynez, California. Martha Aguayo was driving on the same highway ahead of Stufkosky when she struck a deer causing it to fly across the centerline into traffic from the opposite direction. The deer struck a SUV causing its driver to lose control. The driver of the SUV crossed the same centerline where he collided head on with Stufkosky, killing him. Stufkosky’s children later sued the California Department of Transportation in the case Stufkosky v. California Department of Transportation, 97 Cal.App.5th 492 (2023), alleging that their father’s death was due to Caltrans’ negligent design of SR-153, inadequate number of deer crossing signs, and its high posted speed limit. While in the trial court, Caltrans filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Caltrans was immune from liability under Government Code section 830.6, the so called “design immunity” statute. The trial court agreed and the Stufloskys appealed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Newport Beach Team for Prevailing on a Highly Contested Motion to Quash!

    January 08, 2024 —
    Congratulations to Newport Partners Tyler Offenhauser and Jonathan Cothran, and Associate Anisha Kohli, who recently prevailed on behalf of BWB&O’s client before the Orange County Superior Court on a highly contested Motion to Quash Service based on Plaintiff’s failure to timely file and serve a DOE Amendment, naming our client. BWB&O’s client was the owner of a building where Plaintiff, a licensed electrician, was electrocuted while performing an upgrade to the building’s electrical infrastructure. Plaintiff’s original lawsuit named only the building’s tenant, who was also represented by BWB&O. BWB&O was successful earlier this year on a Motion for Summary Judgment under the Privette Doctrine and won judgment on behalf of the client/tenant. While that MSJ was pending, Plaintiff surreptitiously added the building’s owner to the suit with a DOE Amendment, after several months earlier learning the owner and then tenant were entities operated by the same individual. However, Plaintiff never informed counsel or any other party of the filing. Moreover, after the MSJ was granted, Plaintiff then waited several more months to serve the building’s owner. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Fraud Claims and Breach Of Warranty Claims Against Manufacturer

    March 04, 2024 —
    A recent case touches upon two issues that are noteworthy when considering fraud claims and breach of warranty claims against a manufacturer. Below contains a discussion on these claims. Independent Tort Doctrine “Florida’s independent tort doctrine provides that a party may not recover in tort for a contract dispute unless the tort is independent of any breach of contract.” MidAmerica C2L Inc. v. Siemens Energy, Inc., 2024 WL 414620, *6 (M.D.Fla. 2024). This means tort allegations and claims MUST be separate and distinct from performance under the contract. Id. (citation omitted). In MidAmerica C2L, a plaintiff sued a manufacturer relating to sophisticated equipment for a coal gasification plant. The parties entered into different agreements for the equipment and a license where the plaintiff could use the manufacturer’s patented technology for its coal gasification plants. A dispute arose and the plaintiff sued the manufacturer under various legal theories. The manufacturer moved for summary judgment. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Protect Projects From Higher Repair Costs and Property Damage

    March 04, 2024 —
    Every aspect of a jobsite costs more today, from materials and labor to tools and equipment. Take construction input costs for example. While relatively flat in 2023, they remain almost 40% higher than they were pre-pandemic. With borrowing costs still high in the face of a stubbornly strong economy, project financing will remain a challenge. Still, contractors are expected to break more ground in 2024, fueled in part by the CHIPS Act, the Inflation Reduction Act and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Despite wages growing and the labor market remaining tight, many businesses are expected to dive deeper into their backlogs. Meanwhile, the economy is expected to grow with a chance for a short and mild recession. As industry leaders gauge economic pressures, it’s clear businesses must manage their costs—and financial risks in 2024. It’s a year where insurance and safety should take priority. Below are economic trends to monitor, and insurance strategies to help protect this year’s bottom line. Reprinted courtesy of Michael Teng, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    The Other Side of the North Dakota Oil Boom: Evictions

    May 13, 2024 —
    Williams County, North Dakota, is one of the biggest beneficiaries of the state’s fracking boom. In the past decade, millions of barrels of oil have been pumped from its land, and the population of its largest city, Williston, has doubled. But as the oil flowed and workers poured in to staff the rigs, housing options quickly ran dry. The region’s uneven expansion has led to an eviction crisis for the county’s 39,000 residents, according to a recent paper from a group of sociologists affiliated with Princeton University’s Eviction Lab. Williams County saw its eviction rate go from “nearly non-existent” in 2010 to over 7% a decade later, the study found. By 2019, at the height of its oil boom — when the state accounted for 11% of the country’s oil production — its eviction filing rate was comparable to that of large, renter-heavy cities like New York City or Philadelphia, according to Eviction Lab. Though oil production peaked in 2019, the problem hasn’t abated: From January through November 2023, more than 550 evictions were recorded by the Williams County Sheriff’s office, up around 30% from the previous full year. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sarah Holder, Bloomberg

    The National Labor Relations Board Joint Employer Standard is Vacated by the Eastern District of Texas

    April 22, 2024 —
    Many employment laws use the concept of joint employer to make more than one business entity responsible for complying with employment law obligations towards employees who to varying degrees work for, or under the direction of entities who are not technically the employees primary employer. Nowhere is that issue more prevalent than in contractor subcontractor relationships. Over the years the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has developed various tests for determining joint employer status. Unless a business entity is an employer of individuals, the NLRB has no jurisdiction over a dispute between the workers and a business entity for whom they work. It is important for contractors to understand the importance of being an employer and the obligations that flow from such status. Likewise, it is also important to understand when a contractor may be classified as a “joint employer” over certain individuals. Depending on the specific laws involved, such a finding of joint-employer status can happen under the “joint employer doctrine” which often exists in subcontractor and temporary employment arrangements. The “joint-employer doctrine” may render a contractor responsible for another company’s employment liabilities. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Andrew G. Vicknair, D'Arcy Vicknair, LLC
    Mr. Vicknair may be contacted at agv@darcyvicknair.com

    Let’s Talk About a Statutory First-Party Bad Faith Claim Against an Insurer

    February 19, 2024 —
    Let’s talk about a statutory first-party bad faith claim against an insurer under Florida law. A recent opinion, discussed below, does a nice job providing a synopsis of a first-party statutory bad faith claim against an insurer: The Florida Legislature created the first-party bad faith cause of action by enacting section 624.155, Florida Statutes, which imposes a duty on insurers to settle their policyholders’ claims in good faith. The statutory obligation on the insurer is to timely evaluate and pay benefits owed under the insurance policy. The damages recoverable by the insured in a bad faith action are those amounts that are the reasonably foreseeable consequences of the insurer’s bad faith in resolving a claim, which include consequential damages. “[A] statutory bad faith claim under section 624.155 is ripe for litigation when there has been (1) a determination of the insurer’s liability for coverage; (2) a determination of the extent of the insured’s damages; and (3) the required [civil remedy] notice is filed pursuant to section 624.155(3)(a).” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/16/24) – Algorithms Affect the Rental Market, Robots Aim to Lower Construction Costs, and Gen Z Struggle to Find Their Own Space

    February 12, 2024 —
    In our latest roundup, New York’s Prompt Payment Act comes into question, vacancy rates rise in commercial office space, the Biden administration applies project labor agreements on certain federal construction projects, and more! Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team