BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts custom home Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts concrete tilt-up Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts structural steel construction Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts casino resort Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts production housing Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts housing Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts low-income housing Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts Medical building Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts tract home Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts condominium Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts multi family housing Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts Subterranean parking Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts institutional building Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts office building Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts hospital construction Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts townhome construction Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts custom homes Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts mid-rise construction Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts landscaping construction Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts condominiums Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts high-rise construction Building Consultant Cambridge Massachusetts
    Cambridge Massachusetts consulting general contractorCambridge Massachusetts construction project management expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts contractor expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts delay claim expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts architect expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts expert witness commercial buildingsCambridge Massachusetts construction expert testimony
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Consultant Builders Information
    Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Massachusetts Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Building Consultant Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Cambridge Massachusetts

    No state license required for general contracting. Licensure required for plumbing and electrical trades. Companies selling home repair services must be registered with the state.


    Building Consultant Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Central Massachusetts Inc
    Local # 2280
    51 Pullman Street
    Worcester, MA 01606

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Massachusetts Home Builders Association
    Local # 2200
    700 Congress St Suite 200
    Quincy, MA 02169

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Greater Boston
    Local # 2220
    700 Congress St. Suite 202
    Quincy, MA 02169

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Consultant 10/ 10

    North East Builders Assn of MA
    Local # 2255
    170 Main St Suite 205
    Tewksbury, MA 01876

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders and Remodelers Association of Western Mass
    Local # 2270
    240 Cadwell Dr
    Springfield, MA 01104

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Bristol-Norfolk Home Builders Association
    Local # 2211
    65 Neponset Ave Ste 3
    Foxboro, MA 02035

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders & Remodelers Association of Cape Cod
    Local # 2230
    9 New Venture Dr #7
    South Dennis, MA 02660

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Consultant 10/ 10


    Building Consultant News and Information
    For Cambridge Massachusetts


    Claims for Negligence? Duty to Defend Triggered

    Naughty or Nice. Contractor Receives Two Lumps of Coal in Administrative Dispute

    How to Prepare for Potential Construction Disputes Resulting From COVID-19

    Connecticut District Court to Review Proposed Class Action in Defective Concrete Suit

    Another Colorado City Passes Construction Defects Ordinance

    Construction Defect Litigation in Nevada Called "Out of Control"

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (05/17/23) – A Flop in Flipping, Plastic Microbes and Psychological Hard Hats

    When Can a General Contractor’s Knowledge be Imputed to a Developer?

    Coping with Labor & Install Issues in Green Building

    Insurer Must Defend Additional Insured Though Its Insured is a Non-Party

    Three Reasons Late Payments Persist in the Construction Industry

    Mechanic’s Liens- Big Exception

    Packard Condominiums Settled with Kosene & Kosene Residential

    Certificates of Merit: Is Your Texas Certificate Sufficient?

    Global Emissions From Buildings, Construction Climb to Record Levels

    LA Lakers Partially Survive Motion to Dismiss COVID-19 Claims

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2023 New York – Metro Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars

    Vacation Rentals: Liability of the Owner for Injury Suffered by the Renter

    Mondaq’s 2023 Construction Comparative Guide

    Drought Dogs Developers in California's Soaring Housing Market

    Unbilled Costs Remain in Tutor Perini's Finances

    Lasso Needed to Complete Vegas Hotel Implosion

    In Oregon Construction Defect Claims, “Contract Is (Still) King”

    Sewage Treatment Agency Sues Insurer and Contractor after Wall Failure and Sewage Leak

    Labor Shortages In Construction

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    Proposed Changes to Federal Lease Accounting Standards

    90 and 150: Two Numbers You Must Know

    Where Parched California Is Finding New Water Sources

    Hunton Insurance Partner, Larry Bracken, Elected to the American College of Coverage Counsel

    Holding the Bag for Pre-Tender Defense Costs

    Limitations on the Ability to Withdraw and De-Annex Property from a Common Interest Community

    Suing A Payment Bond Surety in Different Venue Than Set Forth in The Subcontract

    Modification: Exceptions to Privette Doctrine Do Not Apply Where There is No Evidence a General Contractor Affirmatively Contributed to the Injuries of an Independent Contractor’s Employee

    Unfinished Building Projects Litter Miami

    Don’t Put All Your Eggs in the Silent-Cyber Basket

    The Credibility of Your Expert (Including Your Delay Expert) Matters in Construction Disputes

    New York Public Library’s “Most Comprehensive Renovation” In Its History

    Wine without Cheese? (Why a construction contract needs an order of precedence clause)(Law Note)

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Recognized in “The Best Lawyers in America” & “Best Lawyers: One’s to Watch” 2024 Editions

    Contractual Warranty Agreements May Preclude Future Tort Recovery

    Approaches in the Absence of a Differing Site Conditions Clause

    FHFA’s Watt Says Debt Cuts Possible for Underwater Homeowners

    Home Prices Expected to Increase All Over the U.S.

    Contract’s Definition of “Substantial Completion” Does Not Apply to Third Party for Purposes of SOL, Holds Court of Appeal

    U.K. Developer Pledges Building Safety in Wake of Grenfell

    Housing Starts in U.S. Surge to Seven-Year High as Weather Warms

    A Court-Side Seat: May Brings Federal Appellate Courts Rulings and Executive Orders

    NYC Shuts 9 Pre-Kindergartens for Health, Safety Issues

    Negligent Construction an Occurrence Says Ninth Circuit
    Corporate Profile

    CAMBRIDGE MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING CONSULTANT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Cambridge, Massachusetts Building Consultant Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Cambridge's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Consultant News & Info
    Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Final Rule Regarding Project Labor Agreement Requirements for Large-Scale Federal Construction Projects

    January 29, 2024 —
    Beginning on January 22, 2024, in compliance with President Biden’s February 4, 2022 Executive Order, 14603, federal construction projects with a total estimated cost of $35 million are required to utilize a project labor agreement (“PLA”) unless the contracting agency grants an exception. The Federal Register estimates that this rule will impact approximately 119 IDIQ contracts each year; these contracts have an average award value of about $114 million. The White House claims the PLAs will improve projects by:
    • Eliminating project delays from labor unrest, such as strikes;
    • Creating dispute resolution procedures and cooperation for labor-management disputes, such as those over safety;
    • Including provisions “to support workers from underserved communities and small businesses”;
    • Helping to create a steady pipeline of workers for federal projects; and
    • Promoting competition on government contracts so that all builders, even those who are non-union, can bid on jobs that require a PLA.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aaron C. Schlesinger, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Schlesinger may be contacted at aschlesinger@pecklaw.com

    Partner John Toohey is Nominated for West Coast Casualty’s Jerrold S. Oliver Award of Excellence!

    March 11, 2024 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is honored to share that Newport Beach Partner John Toohey is nominated for West Coast Casualty’s 2024 Jerrold S. Oliver Award of Excellence! Every year, West Coast Casualty recognizes an individual who is committed, trustworthy, and has contributed years to the betterment of the construction defect community. The award is named after the late Judge Jerrold S. Oliver who is considered a “founding father” in the alternate resolution process in construction claims and litigation. Each year, members of the construction community are asked to nominate individuals who invoke the same spirit as Judge Oliver. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Surety Trends to Keep an Eye on in the Construction Industry

    March 25, 2024 —
    Reflecting on the dynamics of the 2023 construction and surety industries, it is evident that opportunities and challenges have emerged for contractors that will shape the landscape for the year ahead. Contractors can not only capitalize on these trends but protect the successful companies they have already built. PROJECT OPPORTUNITIES There has been a notable increase in public works opportunities, driven by increased government spending and the aging infrastructure in the United States. This trend is expected to continue in 2024 and beyond, with a notable portion of work coming in transportation- and public-utility-related infrastructure. Due to increased spending, many contractors are reporting historically high backlogs—and that often includes the largest project their company has contracted in their history. While increased spending presents more opportunity, it’s critical contractors be even more diligent about new opportunities, giving additional consideration to the following: Job Selection: New geographies, scope, project owners and/or subcontractor relationships commonly come with a learning curve. With the current state of the market, it’s not the ideal time to be learning costly lessons. Contractors should focus on having a proactive go/no-go strategy when reviewing potential projects to identify risks early and plan accordingly. Reprinted courtesy of Oliver Craig, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Perez Broke Records … But Should He Have Settled Earlier?

    February 19, 2024 —
    In 2021, Mark Perez’ Labor Law 240(1) lawsuit made legal news by breaking the record of the highest appellate-sustained pain and suffering award in New York history. While that record was short-lived, it still maintains its place as New York’s highest-ever pain and suffering award for a brain injury. This January 17th, the Appellate Division, First Department revisited the litigation but, this time, in a dispute between Perez and his then-lawyer, Ben Morelli and the Morelli Law Firm. Mr. Perez claims breach of contract over a 10% additional contingency fee charge related to the Perez v. Live Nation appeal and breach of fiduciary duty by his counsel in failing to convey settlement offers during the lifetime of the case. The Morelli firm counters, among other things, that the prior settlement offers – a $30 million offer during the 2019 trial and intermediate sums during the appellate stage – were still lower than the ultimate $55 million settlement. No harm, Mr. Morelli argues, and thus no foul in failing to convey the offers. But is that so? Did Mark Perez ultimately receive more money in his $55 million settlement than from the $30 million settlement offer mid-trial? Despite the glaring $25 million difference, the surprising calculations show that Perez would have been financially better off taking the $30 million mid-trial settlement. Reprinted courtesy of Sofya Uvaydov, Kahana Feld and John F. Watkins, Kahana Feld Ms. Uvaydov may be contacted at suvaydov@kahanafeld.com Mr. Watkins may be contacted at jwatkins@kahanafeld.com Read the full story...

    Environmental Justice Update: The Justice40 Initiative

    April 29, 2024 —
    Soon after taking office, President Biden issued Executive Order 14008, entitled, “Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad.” This is an unusually long and complex executive order and includes many provisions relating to environmental justice and the plight of “disadvantaged communities” that are overwhelmed by many environmental threats. Section 223 of the Order describes the President’s “Justice40 Initiative,” which is designed to ensure that 40% of Federal benefits flow to disadvantaged communities through an “all of government approach.” There is a recognition that some disadvantaged communities lack the personnel and resources to take advantage of this Initiative, so technical training funds will be made available. The Order establishes new offices throughout the Federal bureaucracy to handle and expedite environmental justice matters. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) play a large role in implementing the Initiative by issuing appropriate guidance and assisting the Federal agencies to locate, among the thousands of programs they supervise, suitable programs that will assist disadvantaged communities. At last count, 518 Federal programs administered by 19 distinct Federal agencies could be a good source for the resources needed by disadvantaged communities to cope with air and water pollution and solid waste issues. Direct grants will be made in many cases, and other programs require the community to apply for the funds promised by the Executive Order. In addition, the Order requires participating Federal agencies to assess the value and effectiveness of the benefits bestowed. OMB and the CEQ have issued guidance documents and conducted many meetings with key personnel and members of the disadvantaged communities. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anthony B. Cavender, Pillsbury
    Mr. Cavender may be contacted at anthony.cavender@pillsburylaw.com

    Federal Magistrate Judge Recommends Rescission of Policies

    February 12, 2024 —
    In the recent case of Union Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. 142 Driggs LLC, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220393, Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York recommended granting the insurer's default judgment and holding that of three policies issued to 142 Driggs LLC ("Driggs") be rescinded ab initio. Driggs had represented on its insurance applications that it did not provide parking to anyone other than itself, tenants, and its guests at the subject insured premises. However, Union Mutual learned that Driggs had been renting out three garages to non-tenants. Second, Driggs represented that the mercantile square footage was around 1,000 square feet, when in actuality, it was larger than allowed under the policies. Union Mutual provided underwriting guidelines in connection with its default motion, which state that "parking provided for anyone other than the insured, tenants and their guests," presents an "unacceptable risk." The guidelines also state that answering yes to any "preliminary application questions (which presumably included those regarding mercantile square footage and parking) is an "unacceptable risk." The court held that these guidelines supported a finding that Driggs made material misrepresentation and that Union Mutual relied on these misrepresentations in issuing the policies. The court, as such, recommended that the policies at issue be rescinded from inception. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Craig Rokuson, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Rokuson may be contacted at crokuson@tlsslaw.com

    Courthouse Reporter Series: The Bizarre Case That Required a 117-Year-Old Expert

    December 04, 2023 —
    A recent decision by the Georgia Court of Appeals, Munro v. Georgia Department of Transportation, highlights how overly specific and inflexible rules of evidence can create peculiar results. Munro involved a dispute over the design of a Georgia intersection. No. A23A0404, 2023 WL 4194716 (Ga. Ct. App. June 27, 2023). The plaintiff alleged that the defendant improperly designed the intersection, never corrected that improper design, and failed to properly maintain the intersection. These claims were dismissed for a very odd reason: the plaintiff’s expert witness wasn’t old enough. The case arose from a car accident. A vehicle in which the plaintiff Munro was a passenger collided with a tractor trailer crossing an intersection. Munro sued the Georgia Department of Transportation (DOT) for negligently designing, maintaining, and inspecting the intersection. The DOT filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground of sovereign immunity and a motion to exclude the testimony of the Munros’ expert witness, among other motions. The trial court dismissed the case in full on the sovereign immunity ground and denied the other motions as moot. The Munros appealed. Reprinted courtesy of Todd Heffner, Troutman Pepper and Di'Vennci Lucas, Troutman Pepper Read the full story...
    Mr. Heffner may be contacted at todd.heffner@troutman.com

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/10/24) – New Type of Nuclear Reactor, Big Money Surrounding Sports Stadiums, and Positivity from Fannie Mae’s Monthly Consumer Survey

    February 05, 2024 —
    In our latest roundup, the commercial real estate market poses a risk to financial stability, New York City moves towards net-zero building emissions, workers at several Los Angeles area hotels tentatively agree to a new contract, and more! Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team