BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut mid-rise construction Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut retail construction Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut production housing Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut institutional building Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut Subterranean parking Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut Medical building Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut housing Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut custom homes Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut high-rise construction Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut tract home Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut multi family housing Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut casino resort Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut custom home Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut office building Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut industrial building Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut parking structure Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut structural steel construction Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut landscaping construction Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut condominiums Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut low-income housing Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut townhome construction Building Consultant Fairfield Connecticut
    Fairfield Connecticut consulting architect expert witnessFairfield Connecticut architecture expert witnessFairfield Connecticut construction claims expert witnessFairfield Connecticut expert witness roofingFairfield Connecticut building consultant expertFairfield Connecticut construction scheduling expert witnessFairfield Connecticut construction defect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Consultant Builders Information
    Fairfield, Connecticut

    Connecticut Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Building Consultant Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Fairfield Connecticut

    License required for electrical and plumbing trades. No state license for general contracting, however, must register with the State.


    Building Consultant Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders & Remo Assn of Fairfield Co
    Local # 0780
    433 Meadow St
    Fairfield, CT 06824

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Eastern Connecticut
    Local # 0740
    20 Hartford Rd Suite 18
    Salem, CT 06420

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of New Haven Co
    Local # 0720
    2189 Silas Deane Highway
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hartford Cty Inc
    Local # 0755
    2189 Silas Deane Hwy
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of NW Connecticut
    Local # 0710
    110 Brook St
    Torrington, CT 06790

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Consultant 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Connecticut (State)
    Local # 0700
    3 Regency Dr Ste 204
    Bloomfield, CT 06002

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Consultant 10/ 10


    Building Consultant News and Information
    For Fairfield Connecticut


    Trump Signs $2-Trillion Stimulus Bill for COVID-19 Emergency

    DA’s Office Checking Workers Comp Compliance

    Finalists in San Diego’s Moving Parklet Design Competition Announced

    Palo Alto Proposes Time Limits on Building Permits

    Broker Not Negligent When Insured Rejects Additional Coverage

    #2 CDJ Topic: Valley Crest Landscape v. Mission Pools

    California Supreme Court Clarifies Deadline to File Anti-SLAPP Motions in Light of Amended Pleadings

    Coverage Denied for Insured's Defective Product

    Surety Trends to Keep an Eye on in the Construction Industry

    Critical Materials for the Energy Transition: Of “Rare Earths” and Even Rarer Minerals

    California Superior Court Overrules Insurer's Demurrer on COVID-19 Claim

    Will Claims By Contractors on Big Design-Build Projects Ever End?

    Insurance Litigation Roundup: “Post No Bills!”

    South Carolina Supreme Court Requires Transparency by Rejecting an Insurer’s “Cut-and-Paste” Reservation of Rights

    Like Water For Chocolate: Insurer Prevails Over Chocolatier In Hurricane Sandy Claim

    Loss Caused by Subcontractor's Faulty Work Covered in Georgia

    Condos Down in Denver Due to Construction Defect Litigation

    Insurer in Bad Faith For Refusing to Commit to Appraisal

    Designers Face Fatal Pedestrian Bridge Collapse Fallout

    North Carolina Supreme Court Addresses “Trigger of Coverage,” Allocation and Exhaustion-Related Issues Arising Out of Benzene-Related Claims

    Message from the Chair: Kelsey Funes (Volume I)

    Suppliers Must Also Heed “Right to Repair” Claims

    As Climate Changes, 'Underwater Mortgage' May Take on New Meaning

    Denver Council Committee Approves Construction Defects Ordinance

    Safe Commercial Asbestos-Removal Practices

    Settling with Some, But Not All, of the Defendants in a Construction Defect Case

    Arbitration Provisions Are Challenging To Circumvent

    Subsurface Water Exclusion Found Unambiguous

    National Demand Increases for Apartments, Refuting Calls for Construction Defect Immunity in Colorado

    Arguing Cardinal Change is Different than Proving Cardinal Change

    Insurer Must Pay for Matching Siding of Insured's Buildings

    The Double-Breasted Dilemma

    Absence of Property Damage During Policy Period Equates to No Coverage

    Cooperation and Collaboration With Government May Be on the Horizon

    Waive It Goodbye: Despite Evidence to the Contrary, Delaware Upholds an AIA Waiver of Subrogation Clause

    Good and Bad News on Construction Employment

    Bankruptcy on a Construction Project: Coronavirus Edition

    Lease-Leaseback Battle Continues as First District Court of Appeals Sides with Contractor and School District

    Pinterest Nixes Big San Francisco Lease Deal in Covid Scaleback

    Montrose III: Vertical Exhaustion Applies in Upper Layers of Excess Coverage

    Hurricane Damage Not Covered for Home Owner Not Named in Policy

    Hunton Andrews Kurth Insurance Attorney, Latosha M. Ellis, Honored by Business Insurance Magazine

    Use of Dispute Review Boards in the Construction Process

    What If Your CCP 998 Offer is Silent on Costs?

    BHA Announces New Orlando Location

    A Homeowner’s Subsequent Action is Barred as a Matter of Law by way of a Prior “Right to Repair Act” Claim Resolved by Cash Settlement for Waiver of all Known or Unknown Claims

    Good News on Prices for Some Construction Materials

    Blueprint for Change: How the Construction Industry Should Respond to the FTC’s Ban on Noncompetes

    Certificates as Evidence of Additional Insured Coverage Are All the Rage, But You Deserve Better

    Top 10 OSHA Violations For The Construction Industry In 2023
    Corporate Profile

    FAIRFIELD CONNECTICUT BUILDING CONSULTANT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Fairfield, Connecticut Building Consultant Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Fairfield's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Consultant News & Info
    Fairfield, Connecticut

    What You Should Know About Liquidated Damages and Liability Caps for Delay and Performance Liquidated Damages

    May 06, 2024 —
    Liquidated damage clauses are omnipresent in today’s construction contracts—often considered in early negotiations to provide a degree of certainty and limit financial liability. There are two principal types of LDs appearing in construction contracts—(i.) damages for delay when a contractor fails to deliver a project by a certain milestone; and (ii.) performance damages when a contractor fails to meet specific performance requirements. Differentiating between LDs for delay and LDs for performance—especially when both LD types are combined in the same contract—is key to risk awareness and allocation during contract negotiations and throughout performance. This article briefly outlines what you should know about LDs for delay and LDs for failing to meet certain performance requirements. The article also covers how contractors can allocate and cap risks based on risks each party can either manage, insure, or otherwise limit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Chris Cazenave, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Cazenave may be contacted at ccazenave@joneswalker.com

    Contractor Prevails in Part Against CalOSHA in Valley Fever Case

    February 26, 2024 —
    Fever. Specifically, Valley fever. Caused by the fungus Coccidioides. It lives in the top two to 12 inches of soil, can become airborne when the soil is exposed, and can cause respiratory illness and even death. And apparently, it is present in many parts of California particularly in the Central Valley and along the coast. Who knew? In Granite Construction Company v. Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board, Case No. C086704 (2023), contractor Granite Construction was cited by CalOSHA for exposing its employees to Coccidioides at a large solar power plant known as California Flats Solar Project in Monterey California. The 3rd District Court of Appeal reversed in part. It should be noted that this case originally unpublished, it was then published, and then later depublished, so it should not be relied on for precedential value. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Don’t Ignore a Notice of Contest of Lien

    April 29, 2024 —
    A recent case, Jon M. Hall Company, LLC v. Canoe Creek Investments, LLC, 49 Fla.L.Weekly D812a (Fla. 2d DCA 2024), demonstrates four important things when it comes to liens:
    1. An owner can shorten the time period to foreclose on the lien, whether against the real property or a lien transfer bond, to 60 days by recording a notice of contest of lien;
    2. An owner can transfer a lien to a lien transfer bond during litigation;
    3. An owner can record a notice of contest of lien to force the lienor to amend its lawsuit to sue the lien transfer bond surety within 60 days; and
    4. A contractors’ failure to amend its lawsuit to sue the lien transfer bond within 60 days will extinguish its rights to pursue a claim against the lien transfer bond, and will otherwise extinguish the lien, fairly or unfairly.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Corporate Transparency Act’s Impact on Real Estate: Reporting Companies, Exemptions and Beneficial Ownership Reporting (webinar)

    December 04, 2023 —
    On October 23, 2023, colleague Andrew Weiner and Kevin Gaunt, counsel at Hunton Andrews Kurth, examined the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), effective Jan. 1, 2024, and its impact on real estate entities and transactions, including who is considered a reporting company subject to new beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements and whether an exemption applies. The panel also discussed certain state laws that impose similar reporting requirements as the CTA and described best practices for real estate counsel to assist their clients with preparing for the CTA’s implementation and ongoing compliance. The panel also reviewed other important considerations, including:
    1. Which real estate entities will likely be most affected by the CTA’s implementation and why?
    2. What exemptions may apply?
    3. How will the CTA’s reporting requirements affect real estate transactions for lenders and investors/buyers?
      1. Read the full story...
        Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

        US Civil Rights Tools Are Failing the Most Polluted Black Communities

        February 05, 2024 —
        In 2022, the United Nations declared that access to a safe and healthy environment, free of pollutants and toxic waste, is a universal human right. The resolution provides a legal foundation for international challenges to environmental injustice; it should also provide an impetus for nations like the US to enforce their own environmental protections. Without more clearly defined rights, some of the greatest environmental injustices may continue to be mired in politics. Take the case of “Cancer Alley,” an 85-mile stretch along the Mississippi River in Louisiana where Black residents have long faced higher rates of death and morbidity due to polluted and toxic environments. For people of color living in the region, fresh air is certainly not a right; it is a privilege for others to experience. Reprinted courtesy of Manann Donoghoe, Bloomberg and Andre Perry, Bloomberg Read the full story...

        Arizona Is Smart About Water. It Should Stay That Way.

        February 19, 2024 —
        You really have to hand it to Arizona: Even as its population has doubled and it has suffered through a decades long megadrought, the state uses less water today than it did 40 years ago. This success story is the result of what may be the smartest, most conservative approach to water in the country. But homebuilders want to scrap some key elements of this careful system. It’s a bad idea, especially as the climate changes, making the state’s water supply less reliable. And it’s a cautionary tale for the rest of us as we try to adapt to a warming world. In 1980, alarmed at watching its precious groundwater disappear amid rapid development, Arizona passed the Groundwater Management Act. The law established the Arizona Department of Water Resources, set up water-management zones around cities and required new housing developments to prove they had access to 100 years’ worth of clean water, among other things. Read the full story...
        Reprinted courtesy of Mark Gongloff, Bloomberg

        There’s the 5 Second Rule, But Have You Heard of the 5 Year Rule?

        April 23, 2024 —
        They’re called deadlines for a reason. Usually, because something really bad could happen if you fail to meet the deadline. For those in the construction industry, you probably aware of the “deadline” to bring a claim for latent defects (10 years from substantial completion); the deadline to file suit to foreclose on a mechanics lien (90 days from the date of recording the mechanics lien), and the deadline for serving a preliminary notice (generally, 20 days from the date labor and/or materials are first furnished). Well, here’s another deadline: Under Code of Civil Procedure section 585.310, you have 5 years after a complaint is filed to bring a case to trial, absent the court granting relief. I could leave it at that, but in the next case, Oswald v. Landmark Builders, Inc., 97 Cal.App.5th 240 (2023), was too interesting to pass up. The Oswald Case On June 28, 2016, homeowners Jack Oswald and Anne Seley sued their general contractor and its subcontractors alleging construction defects at their home. Answers and cross-complaints were filed and on February 2017 the trial court determined the case to be complex and appointed a discovery master. A discovery master, for those who may be unfamiliar, is usually a retired judge or third-party lawyer appointed by a court to oversee discovery in a case such as written discovery, depositions, site inspections, etc. Read the full story...
        Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Nomos LLP
        Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

        Court Finds Matching of Damaged Materials is Required by Policy

        April 02, 2024 —
        The court granted, in part, the insured's motion for summary judgment by finding that matching roof tiles were required under the policy. Bertisen v. Travelers Home and Marine Ins. Co., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3907 (D. Colo. Jan. 8, 2024). The insureds sued Travelers for breach of contract, common law bad faith, and unreasonable delay or denial of benefits. They alleged that their residence was damaged by a hailstorm and that Travelers breached their policy and acted in bad faith in the handling of the claim. The insureds demanded an appraisal to determine the "amount of loss" under the policy and an appraisal award was issued. Travelers then denied payment for all roof tiles that were contemplated by the appraisal award. Read the full story...
        Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
        Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com